| Author |
Message |
|
Maffa
|
 Posted: Nov 06, 2007 - 09:54 PM
|
 
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 73
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
|
|
Quote:
does anyone have the current requirements for the program?
basing upon the words of Chief Moseley: it is *that* important, since this will be a patch and a gap filler between B1s and the pentasonic exoatmospheric (unmanned?) bomber? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
 Posted: Nov 23, 2008 - 1:35 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maffa
|
|
Posted: Nov 06, 2007 - 10:17 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 73
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
|
Maybe everybody already knew, but there's an interesting <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/9a/Idr020524_1_p.jpg" target="_blank">wikipedia entry</a> about the FB-22, as old as 2004 (if i am not wrong). It says it would be a two seated, all-wing a\c, have substantially the same regional usage of F-111, no vectorial thrust, 1600 miles range, stealth internal bays and -as per 2004 news- wide usage of SDBs, as many as 30.
There's also a mockup image:
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
checksixx
|
|
Posted: Nov 07, 2007 - 02:10 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K
Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 1035
Status: Offline
|
| Not a chance I'm reading an article on Wiki...Too many experts that have no idea what they're talking about. I've never seen that 'mockup' in official documentation...looks more like someone had fun with photoshop. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maffa
|
|
Posted: Nov 07, 2007 - 02:19 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 73
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
|
I take no responsability... just saw it and posted  Anyway it is just 2004 old stuff... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thumper3181
|
|
Posted: Nov 08, 2007 - 04:59 AM
|
|
|
Senior member
Joined: Jun 23, 2006
Posts: 435
Status: Offline
|
| Maffa, Wiki has absolutely no credibility. The articles are not vetted and anyone can write them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maffa
|
|
Posted: Nov 08, 2007 - 08:40 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 73
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Forum Guidelines
