| Author |
Message |
|
mcashe
|
Posted: Mar 14, 2007 - 03:01 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 21, 2004
Posts: 27
Status: Offline
|
|
flightglobal.com wrote:
First F-35 resume flights tests
Lockheed Martin's first F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) returned to flight on 5 March after a software update to incorporate performance data from its first seven flights.
Aircraft AA-1 is expected to fly twice weekly as the company continues to expand the flight envelope.
The second JSF - the first short take-off and vertical landing (STOVL) F-35B and the first with weight-optimised airframe - is now scheduled to fly in May-June 2008.
Final assembly of the aircraft, BF-1, is already under way at Lockheed's Fort Worth, Texas plant.
Source: Flight International
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Nov 22, 2008 - 11:45 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Shaken
|
Posted: Mar 14, 2007 - 06:40 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Posts: 30
Status: Offline
|
Our friends at FlightGlobal posted an article and lovely picture of the first afterburning Lightning II take-off. The article also has some good content on the recent software upgrades.
flightglobal.com wrote:
Picture: Lockheed Martin’s F-35 Joint Strike Fighter soars on first afterburner take-off
By Graham Warwick
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter made its first afterburner take-off from Lockheed Martin’s Fort Worth, Texas plant on 13 March. “It was an amazingly steep climb-out,” says company spokesman John Kent.
The first F-35, aircraft AA-1, is powered by a Pratt & Whitney F135 turbofan capable of producing more than 40,000lb of thrust with full reheat. The departure was so steep because test pilot Jon Beesley had to stay within the 250kt airspeed limit for the initial climb-out.
AA-1 returned to flight on 5 March after a five-week stand-down to incorporate scheduled software and hardware upgrades. This included updating the software to incorporate performance data collected during the first seven flights since the F-35’s maiden sortie on 15 December.
“Before the first flight we set the control limits very tight, as a precaution, so the systems were very sensitive,” says F-35 programme general manager Dan Crowley. “Now we have set the parameters to the right level.” This should reduce false alarms from sensors in the fuel and other systems, he says.
One software update tackled the air-data sensor mismatch caused by airflow around the large single nosegear door. This was producing slightly different angle-of-attack readings from the left and right air-data probes. “It was just 1-2º, but now it is corrected,” says Crowley. All subsequent F-35s will have two smaller doors.
A borescope inspection of the F136 engine was also conducted while the aircraft was stood down. “It was okay, so we reinstalled it,” says Crowley. Flights with the helmet-mounted display – the primary flight instrument on the F-35, which lacks a head-up display – are expected to begin shortly.
Over its first seven flights, each lasting around an hour, the F-35 reached Mach 0.8, 23,000ft and 16º angle-of-attack. The aircraft is scheduled to fly twice a week to continue expanding the flight envelope as Lockheed assembles the second JSF – the first short take-off and vertical landing F-35B – which is expected to fly in May-June next year.
Crowley says AA-1 behaved impeccably over its first series of flights. “Every time, it returned Code 1, ready to fly again. That is unheard of for a flight-test article,” he says. Test pilot Beesley has said the aircraft has “remarkable flying qualities”.
Source: <a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2007/03/14/212602/picture-lockheed-martins-f-35-joint-strike-fighter-soars-on-first-afterburner.html" rel="nofollow">flightglobal.com</a>
I'd really like to see video of the "steep climb-out" described.
The mention of the F136 engine is probably a typo, as the AA-1 is F135 powered.
-- Shaken - out -- |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Lieven
|
Posted: Mar 28, 2007 - 02:20 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Webmaster

Joined: May 23, 2003
Posts: 2388
|
|
flightglobal.com wrote:
Lockheed Martin's F-35 Joint Strike Fighter begins manoeuvre tests
Flightglobal.com 23 March 2007
by Guy Norris
Lockheed Martin’s F-35 Joint Strike Fighter has completed its first manoeuvring flight tests, complete with full-stick rolls.
"It worked exceedingly well," says F-35 chief test pilot Jon Beesley, who praises the aircraft and its "robust" handling characteristics.
The first 360º rolls took place during the fighter’s ninth test flight on 20 March. The first F-35, aircraft AA-1, is expected to make its 10th flight any day now, and Lockheed expects to complete initial airworthiness tests over the next few sorties.
"The aircraft is very stiff compared to the F-22 in which you feel as if you're at the end of a diving board. With the F-35 you're standing at the other end," Beesley told a symposium of test pilots late last week.
One peculiarity of the JSF design, he says, is the splitterless inlet which "picks up an extra 2,000lb thrust" as the aircraft accelerates between 80kt and 100kt for take-off. The jump in thrust is "definitely noticeable in the cockpit," Beesley says.
Speaking at the Society of Experimental Test Pilots meeting in San Diego, California Beesley also praised the F-35's Pratt & Whitney F135 engine, which produces "perfect linear thrust" throughout its 40,000lb-plus power range.
Source: <a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2007/03/27/212940/lockheed-martins-f-35-joint-strike-fighter-begins-manoeuvre.html" rel="nofollow">Flightglobal.com</a>
Overview of the AA-1 test flights- #1: 15 Dec 2006
- #2: 08 Jan 2007
- #3: 10 Jan 2007
- #4: 23 Jan 2007
- #6: 29 Jan 2007
- #7: 30 Jan 2007
- #8: 05 Mar 2007
- #9: 13 Mar 2007 (the above article incorrectly says it was on the 20th)
- #10: end March 2007
 F-35 Lightning II ninth flight - March 13th, 2007
 F-35 Lightning II ninth flight - March 13th, 2007
See the <a href="gallery_item101114.html">F-35 photo gallery</a> for more pictures. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
dwightlooi
|
Posted: Apr 11, 2007 - 08:41 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Aug 01, 2006
Posts: 1004
Status: Offline
|
|
Shaken wrote:
I'd really like to see video of the "steep climb-out" described.
The mention of the F136 engine is probably a typo, as the AA-1 is F135 powered.
-- Shaken - out --
Here you go...
A/B climb out video
Looks like >50 degree climb, maybe 60+. Hard to tell accurately from the video. But the plane appears to go steeper and steeper towards the later part of the video clip. Looks like the pilot is pulling the nose up to keep acceleration in check. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Dipstick
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2007 - 03:18 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Dec 17, 2006
Posts: 8
Status: Offline
|
|
dwightlooi wrote:
Looks like the pilot is pulling the nose up to keep acceleration in check.
That's exactly what he's doing because the engine is so powerfull. |
_________________ Design engineer F-35, A400M.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
asiatrails
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2007 - 03:59 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Aug 30, 2005
Posts: 750
Status: Offline
|
|
Dipstick wrote:
dwightlooi wrote:
Looks like the pilot is pulling the nose up to keep acceleration in check.
That's exactly what he's doing because the engine is so powerfull.
Fantastic intake howl (resonance) it sounds like a real airplane.
Gums do you have any comments compared to the F100 / F104? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
dwightlooi
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2007 - 07:11 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Aug 01, 2006
Posts: 1004
Status: Offline
|
|
asiatrails wrote:
Fantastic intake howl (resonance) it sounds like a real airplane.
Gums do you have any comments compared to the F100 / F104?
You'll need to find somebody REALLY OLD to have heard an F100 or F104... jeez, somebody in his twenties in the 1950 or 60s. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Madewooden
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2007 - 10:39 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Apr 27, 2006
Posts: 26
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Status: Offline
|
| The F-100 doing an afterburner take-off initially sounds like a controlled explosion! Heard 'em when I was stationed at Eglin in '71 and again in the '80s 'cause the Turks were still flyin' 'em at The Lik. Wanna hear something really loud. . . F-105 with full water augmentation. The sound was deafening and the shockwaves caused the flourescent tubes in our ceiling lights in the flight shack to crash down on top of us. Sounded worse than a ten-engine take off on some B-52s! |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
johnwill
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2007 - 07:02 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Mar 24, 2007
Posts: 453
Status: Offline
|
| Loud? LOUD?? Try a B-58 with four J-79s at max burner. Or two B-58s during minimum interval takeoff (MITO). Madewooden, the B-52 has only eight engines. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Gums
|
Posted: Apr 13, 2007 - 04:08 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Dec 16, 2003
Posts: 824
Status: Offline
|
Salute!
The Hun did not have a very unique noise.
The Zipper DID HAVE A NEAT NOISE!!! Still does.
Must be some acoustical deal with the intake design and the front few compressor stages. The 104 still has a unique sound, and I could prolly recognize it to this day.
The Thud also had a neat sound. The 106 using the same motor didn't have that sound. So it's gotta be a combo of intake and motor.
None of the fans have a real screech except the early Vipers. The Sluf and Eagle sound more like vacuum cleaners.
The early Hornets also had a unique sound. The motor was not a true fan, but more like a "leaky" turbojet.
Short war story:
When the 'birds went to the Viper, the screech was so bad for the VIP section on the flightline that they started the engines and ran them using the BUC. Once on the taxiway, they went to basic UFC for the motor. I ain't making this up.
It musta been something about the inlet guide vane postion, but we'll have to find a really old Pratt motor guy who was born just after the Earth was cooling - like me!
That's my story, and I'm stickin' to it.
out, |
_________________ Gums
Viper pilot '79
"God in your guts, good men at your back, wings that stay on - and Tally Ho!"
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sferrin
|
Posted: Apr 13, 2007 - 04:28 AM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 22, 2005
Posts: 1093
Status: Offline
|
|
johnwill wrote:
Loud? LOUD?? Try a B-58 with four J-79s at max burner. Or two B-58s during minimum interval takeoff (MITO). Madewooden, the B-52 has only eight engines.
I'd have liked to have heard the B-70. Six 30,000lb turbojets had to be loud. Can't imagine what the US SST would have been like with four 67,000lb afterburning turbojets. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Purplehaze
|
Posted: Apr 13, 2007 - 01:53 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Apr 26, 2004
Posts: 1215
Status: Offline
|
|
dwightlooi wrote:
asiatrails wrote:
Fantastic intake howl (resonance) it sounds like a real airplane.
Gums do you have any comments compared to the F100 / F104?
You'll need to find somebody REALLY OLD to have heard an F100 or F104... jeez, somebody in his twenties in the 1950 or 60s.
Watch it there Dwight, I've worked on both 100's and 104's and I'm not really that old.......LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
johnwill
|
Posted: Apr 13, 2007 - 04:54 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Mar 24, 2007
Posts: 453
Status: Offline
|
| In 1966, the Air Force Association had their national convention in Fort Worth, including a great air show at Carswell AFB. The USAF brought in almost every thing they owned for static and flying displays. SR-71, B-70, U-2, B-58, F-111, and all the century series fighters. I'll never forget it. Highlight was the B-70 and B-58 flyby in formation. I've still got photos of that somewhere in a closet. I remember walking around under the B-70, being careful not trip over all the leak buckets collecting fuel. It was really impressive on takeoff. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|