| Author |
Message |
|
Neno
|
Posted: Mar 16, 2007 - 09:27 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Sep 29, 2006
Posts: 129
Status: Offline
|
| Check, what do you mean when you talk about IRST on F22? are you referring to aim9x seekers? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Nov 23, 2008 - 1:00 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
|
|
|
 |
|
checksixx
|
Posted: Mar 16, 2007 - 01:07 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 1035
Status: Offline
|
| I'm talking about the embedded system. The F-22 does not employ AIM-9X. Check |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Neno
|
Posted: Mar 16, 2007 - 01:54 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Sep 29, 2006
Posts: 129
Status: Offline
|
Uh?? I din't knew the Raptor had an IRST, i heard about the intention of filling it in some future block. This is a pretty news, thanks !!
checksixx wrote:
The F-22 does not employ AIM-9X. Check
I hope it will do tomorrow .. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
checksixx
|
Posted: Mar 16, 2007 - 02:34 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 1035
Status: Offline
|
| As far as I know it has it...I certainly could be wrong, but its supposed to...Check |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
dwightlooi
|
Posted: Mar 16, 2007 - 03:34 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Aug 01, 2006
Posts: 1004
Status: Offline
|
|
checksixx wrote:
As far as I know it has it...I certainly could be wrong, but its supposed to...Check
The F-22 TODAY does not have any IRST system. It does have a number of IR based missile warning detectors. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
psychmike
|
Posted: Mar 16, 2007 - 03:35 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 27, 2004
Posts: 90
Status: Offline
|
|
checksixx wrote:
As far as I know it has it...I certainly could be wrong, but its supposed to...Check
I believe the IRST was deferred as well have heard that it may be pushed forward for development. No mention of it in the issues of International Air Power or World Air Power Journal that I have.
Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Mar 16, 2007 - 04:07 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2862
|
|
checksixx wrote:
As far as I know it has it...I certainly could be wrong, but its supposed to...Check
I could be very wrong so someone correct me:
-F-22 was designed with the ability to have IRST but it was left out for now (cost) and might be a growth upgrade later.
-F-22 was also designed to have a cheek array on the right and left nose and there is space for it, but that was also left out for now for cost reasons and could be put in later as a growth upgrade. Could do some even more scary ISR stuff. |
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
idesof
|
Posted: Mar 16, 2007 - 09:26 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: May 29, 2006
Posts: 640
Status: Offline
|
|
elp wrote:
I could be very wrong so someone correct me:
-F-22 was designed with the ability to have IRST but it was left out for now (cost) and might be a growth upgrade later.
-F-22 was also designed to have a cheek array on the right and left nose and there is space for it, but that was also left out for now for cost reasons and could be put in later as a growth upgrade. Could do some even more scary ISR stuff.
You are exactly right, elp. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Lieven
|
Posted: Apr 12, 2007 - 08:23 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Webmaster

Joined: May 23, 2003
Posts: 2388
|
This thread was taken offline and have now been placed back after some serious clean up. Bluefor and MKeldergod have been banned. Sorry we noticed this thread so late. To avoid this in the future, we have added the 'Report this post to a moderator' links to every single post. Feel free to use it.
Regards,
Lieven |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
toan
|
Posted: Apr 13, 2007 - 01:47 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Nov 27, 2004
Posts: 535
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
raptorman22
|
Posted: Feb 15, 2008 - 08:09 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Feb 15, 2008
Posts: 1
Status: Offline
|
| I am doing a research paper on the F-22 and I was wondering if anyone knows of a reliable source that can show the specs and what not |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
JaM1977
|
Posted: Feb 15, 2008 - 12:30 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Jul 13, 2007
Posts: 18
Status: Offline
|
| I find kinda funny that all development costs are counted only for F-22 and not for F-35. Without F-22 development, F-35 would never exist! So please count development costs againt and share the numbers between those two... |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
sprstdlyscottsmn
|
Posted: Feb 16, 2008 - 03:56 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Mar 10, 2006
Posts: 374
Status: Offline
|
| Developement costs are often stated for both types, but the F-22 only has an expected production run of 180 airframes to spread that out over while the F-35 has an expected 2,400-3,500 airframes to spread it out over. |
_________________ James,
-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Conan
|
Posted: Feb 16, 2008 - 09:57 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Apr 27, 2007
Posts: 199
Status: Offline
|
|
raptorman22 wrote:
I am doing a research paper on the F-22 and I was wondering if anyone knows of a reliable source that can show the specs and what not
The USAF fact sheet should be pretty reliable...
http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=199
There is an email contact address at the bottom of that page for the USAF Air Combat Command which may be able to provide further information, if required. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tinito_16
|
Posted: Feb 16, 2008 - 08:12 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 248
Status: Offline
|
Speaking of reliability:
Conan wrote:
raptorman22 wrote:
I am doing a research paper on the F-22 and I was wondering if anyone knows of a reliable source that can show the specs and what not
The USAF fact sheet should be pretty reliable...
http://www.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?fsID=199
There is an email contact address at the bottom of that page for the USAF Air Combat Command which may be able to provide further information, if required.
Has anyone noticed the weight?... I dont think it can be less than 20,000 lbs. Either that's just the airframe without ANYTHING or we went from a 1.3ish thrust to weight to 1.6ish (counting full fuel and ~4k internal stores). |
_________________ "Like the coldest winter chill, heaven beside you...hell within" Alice In Chains
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|